两个会话分别只执行一个SQL会不会形成死锁

网友投稿 323 2023-12-18

两个会话分别只执行一个SQL会不会形成死锁

这篇文章给大家介绍两个会话分别只执行一个SQL会不会形成死锁,内容非常详细,感兴趣的小伙伴们可以参考借鉴,希望对大家能有所帮助。

两个会话分别只执行一个SQL会不会形成死锁

1,问题

两个会话分别只执行一个SQL,可能形成死锁吗?

2,测试设想

   对于一个大表(比如100万条记录),两个会话分别从一个大表的两端(头、尾)更新,就可能形成互相等待对方已占有资源的情况,从而形成死锁。

3,测试

3.1测试版本

Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production

PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.3.0 - Production

CORE    11.2.0.3.0      Production

TNS for IBM/AIX RISC System/6000: Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production

NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production

3.2 创建测试用表

create table tmp_x(x int,y int);

插入数据

insert into tmp_x

select rownum,rownum

from dual

connect by level<1e6+1;

创建索引:

create index idx_tmp_x_x on tmp_x(x);

收集统计信息:

begin

  dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(user,TMP_X);

end;

/  

3.3测试

--会话1

查看执行计划:

explain plan for update /*+ index_asc(t idx_tmp_x_x) */ tmp_x t set y=1 where x>1;

select * from table(dbms_xplan.display(null,null,Advanced));

Plan hash value: 4167283686

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| Id  | Operation         | Name        | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|   0 | UPDATE STATEMENT  |             |   999K|  9765K|  4340   (2)| 00:00:01 |

|   1 |  UPDATE           | TMP_X       |       |       |            |          |

|*  2 |   INDEX RANGE SCAN| IDX_TMP_X_X |   999K|  9765K|  2254   (2)| 00:00:01 |

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Predicate Information (identified by operation id):

---------------------------------------------------

   2 - access("X">1)

Column Projection Information (identified by operation id):

-----------------------------------------------------------

2 - (upd=3; cmp=2) "T".ROWID[ROWID,10], "X"[NUMBER,22], "Y"[NUMBER,22]

执行SQL:

update /*+ index_asc(t idx_tmp_x_x) */ tmp_x t set y=1 where x>1;

--会话2

查看执行计划(使用提示index_desc,CARDINALITY):

explain plan for update /*+ index_desc(t idx_tmp_x_x) CARDINALITY(t 1000) */ tmp_x t set y=2 where x<1e6;

select * from table(dbms_xplan.display(null,null,Advanced));

Plan hash value: 2352573976

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| Id  | Operation                    | Name        | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|   0 | UPDATE STATEMENT             |             |  1000 | 10000 |  4340   (2)| 00:00:01 |

|   1 |  UPDATE                      | TMP_X       |       |       |            |          |

|*  2 |   INDEX RANGE SCAN DESCENDING| IDX_TMP_X_X |  1000 | 10000 |  2254   (2)| 00:00:01 |

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Predicate Information (identified by operation id):

---------------------------------------------------

   2 - access("X"<1e6)

filter("X"<1e6)

执行SQL:

update /*+ index_desc(t idx_tmp_x_x) CARDINALITY(t 1000) */ tmp_x t set y=2 where x<1e6;

---会话3

查看会话1,2的等待事件:

select sid,event,blocking_session from v$session where sid in (1894,2324);

SID EVENT                         BLOCKING_SESSION

---------- ----------------------------- ----------------

      1894 SQL*Net message from client   

      2324 SQL*Net message from client   

SQL> /

SID EVENT                         BLOCKING_SESSION

---------- ----------------------------- ----------------

1894 gc current request

      2324 db file sequential read       

SQL> /

       SID EVENT                         BLOCKING_SESSION

---------- ----------------------------- ----------------

      1894 db file scattered read        

      2324 gc current request            

SQL> /

SID EVENT                         BLOCKING_SESSION

---------- ----------------------------- ----------------

      1894 gc current multi block reques

      2324 db file scattered read        

SQL> /

SID EVENT                         BLOCKING_SESSION

---------- ----------------------------- ----------------

1894 gc current request

      2324 gc current request            

SQL> /

       SID EVENT                         BLOCKING_SESSION

---------- ----------------------------- ----------------

      1894 gc current request            

      2324 db file sequential read       

SQL> /

SID EVENT                         BLOCKING_SESSION

---------- ----------------------------- ----------------

      1894 db file sequential read       

      2324 db file scattered read        

SQL> /

SID EVENT                         BLOCKING_SESSION

---------- ----------------------------- ----------------

      1894 log buffer space              

2324 log buffer space

SQL> /

       SID EVENT                         BLOCKING_SESSION

---------- ----------------------------- ----------------

      1894 gc current request            

      2324 gc current request            

SQL> /

SID EVENT                         BLOCKING_SESSION

---------- ----------------------------- ----------------

1894 enq: TX - row lock contention

      2324 enq: TX - row lock contention

SQL> /

SID EVENT                         BLOCKING_SESSION

---------- ----------------------------- ----------------

1894 enq: TX - row lock contention             2324

      2324 enq: TX - row lock contention             1894

SQL> /

SID EVENT                         BLOCKING_SESSION

---------- ----------------------------- ----------------

1894 enq: TX - row lock contention             2324

      2324 enq: TX - row lock contention             1894

SQL> /

SID EVENT                         BLOCKING_SESSION

---------- ----------------------------- ----------------

1894 enq: TX - row lock contention             2324

      2324 enq: TX - row lock contention             1894

SQL> /

       SID EVENT                         BLOCKING_SESSION

---------- ----------------------------- ----------------

      1894 enq: TX - row lock contention             2324

      2324 enq: TX - row lock contention

SQL> /

       SID EVENT                         BLOCKING_SESSION

---------- ----------------------------- ----------------

      1894 enq: TX - row lock contention             2324

      2324 enq: TX - row lock contention

SQL> /

SID EVENT                         BLOCKING_SESSION

---------- ----------------------------- ----------------

      1894 enq: TX - row lock contention

      2324 SQL*Net message from client   

--会话1

update /*+ index_asc(t idx_tmp_x_x) */ tmp_x t set y=1 where x>1

                                       *

ERROR at line 1:

ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource

3.4测试结论

  两个会话分别只执行一个SQL,也可能形成死锁。

关于两个会话分别只执行一个SQL会不会形成死锁就分享到这里了,希望以上内容可以对大家有一定的帮助,可以学到更多知识。如果觉得文章不错,可以把它分享出去让更多的人看到。

版权声明:本文内容由网络用户投稿,版权归原作者所有,本站不拥有其著作权,亦不承担相应法律责任。如果您发现本站中有涉嫌抄袭或描述失实的内容,请联系我们jiasou666@gmail.com 处理,核实后本网站将在24小时内删除侵权内容。

上一篇:DBA_HIST_EVENT_HISTOGRAM定位GPFS写缓慢问题该怎么分析
下一篇:警务综合平台的发展趋势
相关文章

 发表评论

暂时没有评论,来抢沙发吧~